Analysing Levels Of European Integration In The 1970s Politics Essay

Analysing Levels Of atomic number 63an consolidation In The s resulties Politics EssayHow much, and for what reasons did the attend to of European desegregation thick surmount in the seventies? The ten dollar bill of 1970s is re everyy a great deal con gradientred as the time of stagnancy or slowing low-spirited in the help of European integration. Some analysts like Caporaso and Keeler c wholly this outcome doldrums era of the Dark Ages for the Community,1or like Dinan acknowledgmentises it a harmonization in European integration.2However, shadower we say that the phrase harmonization equals doldrums? The more adequate appears to be Andrew Moravcsik claiming, that the particular era can be considered 2fold, from the federalist point of view it was the time of stagnation, but on the other hand, it was to a fault a cristal of some(prenominal) consolidation and innovation.3For the reason of much(prenominal) several(a) outlooks to wards that reliable time of Europea n integration, in order to testify and rate how much process of integration in European Community slowed down, authoritative is to explore and explain the achievements and innovations that were implemented during the entirely 1970s. Nevertheless, in order to experience more objective picture crucial is to include in that considerations withal all failures of the decade. Furthermore, with the intention to determine a reason for the lack of profound approach in 1970s, the domestic situation of section states and events that took place interior the Community will be studied in this essay, but similarly for the enhancement of the general conclusion, an b oilersuit condition of Europe and the world in that specific period of time. 1970s seems to be a phase of changes in directions of integration in Europe, therefore it is vital to found out why states atomic number 18 considered to act more separately than collectively in that time, and began to be, to a greater extent than in previous decades, concerned with their national interests. Next, other fundamental question emerges, i.e. why consensus and unanimity in ending-making became so challenging to achieve. In addition, it is essential to mention, that the starting point for the decade was Hague line of longitude, held in 1969, which wide-awake the ground for further advances,4in other words, during that point aims were established to be attained during adjacent few years. Consequently, it will be analysed whether and to what extent such goals has been realised during the decade. In order to possess this essay clearer, in the start-off part will be analysed how much the process of European integration slowed down, and in the second will be provided reasons for such occurrence. In the conclusions the master(prenominal) points of the essay will be summarised and there will be created an overall picture of the decade.The attempt of assessing how much did the process of European integration slow d own in the 1970s appears to be caperatic, because this particular decade, as literally as all previous periods beginning from the end of the succor know directge base War, differ substantially in many scopes, consequently it is hard to equal them. All the most meaningful agreements and treaties for the establishment the European Community, and hence last European Union control been inaugurated in 1950s, videlicet accord of genus capital of France launching ECSC, then establishment of WEU, as well as Treaty of Rome founding atomic number 63 and EURATOM. Also sixties is all important(predicate) time, when EEC and Custom Unions were instituted, the European Community was formed, and the Hague summit took place determining strands and goals for the next decade. It can be argued that in that background 1970s are seen as quite poor period, because of the lack of any significant treaties or innovations, which would be meaningful from our perspective, over 30 years subseque ntly. Nevertheless, during 1970s numerous important improvements were go ind, but in order to obtain more insightful and spatiotemporal image of the overall decade it is essential to revise non only(prenominal) all the most principal achievements of that time, but also all attempts and efforts that sustain been undertaken, even if they ended up un prosperedly.After the Hague summit first coming upon aiming to determine necessary task to fulfil in order to make a maturate in functioning European Community was capital of France summit, where has been agreed by the participants, to modify the present Community into more prescribed form of political cooperation, namely European Union. Although capital of France summit can be regarded as an attempt to develop European collaboration, its contribution into bona fide integration is rather slight, some find it as the summit be intention for further integration rather than producing any vital advancement. Nevertheless, Paris summi t had an carry on on few important innovations that have been achieved later. For instance, during that summit has been made significant effort to initiate collective environmental indemnity, Dinan claims Paris summit was the genesis of the ECs first Environmental Action Program.5A nonher successful outcome of Paris summit was the execution of instrument of the European Social computer storage in 1974 to improve the quality of life of its citizens.6Next noteworthy achievement of the 1970s was the sign of the Lom Convention in 1975, the trade agreement betwixt the EC and group of 46 African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. That heighten the meaning of the EC in the international arena. In the result, for the first time in score of the European Community, European Political Cooperation has been launched, granting the EC official significance as the unity in foreign policy. From that moment during numerous international meetings of states or institutions, the EC was capable to perform and participate as the single physical structure of cohesive states, acting as a representation of all instalment states of the European Community.Furthermore, the Treaty of Luxembourg in 1970 extended the European Parliaments portion in budgetary dispositions and regulations.7It was not, however, the only improvement affecting the functioning of the European Parliament during that certain decade. At the decay of the 1970s, after long steadfast struggles, mainly because of the long process of legislative amendments in British Parliament,8in 1979 for the first time direct elections to European Parliament were held in all piece states, which consolidated the EC democratically, and granted the EC more legitimatise power.Nonetheless, European Parliaments innovation was not the only progress in context of institutional improvements that have been reached during 1970s. Even more important than Parliamentary elections emerges to be the creation of the European Council in 197 4, as the body for the regular meetings of heads of all the member states to determine the direction for further progress. Some analysts call the decade of 1970s an era of summitry.9Nevertheless, the European Council was first authorised body of the EC, where political leaders of the member states were formally able to meet and discuss the future tense of the Community and the collective interests.Moreover, 1970s was a time of significant progress towards Monetary Union, which was not established eventually in that decade, and it is very often regarded as the main failure of that decade, but the reasons for that will be explained later in that essay. However, negotiations in that field have been inaugurated. The most successive achievements towards future European Monetary Union was in 1978 the decision to implement of the European Monetary System.10All the in a higher place programs and creations were of the significant importance primarily because they are concerned as the poli cy of deepening of integration. In spite of that, 1970s was the period of the first amplification of the European Community, subsequently first footfall of the policy of widening. In 1973 three states, namely United Kingdom, Denmark, and Ireland uniteed to the half a dozen states that founded the community in 1957. Even if we say that all endeavours during the livelong decade of 1970s aiming to deepen European integration was not very successful, we emphatically cannot deny the significance of the first enlargements of the Community. Therefore, at least from that perspective, 1970s appears to be crucial period of time for the EUs future.Above examples prove that 1970s is not accurately regarded as the total stagnation in European integration, both in the scope of deepening as well as widening. Notwithstanding, the process of integration certainly slowed down to a significant exchange in that particular decade. In 1970s vital is the fact that the character of the European integ ration has diametrically changed in a comparison to previous periods. In further part of that essay the reasons for that phenomenon will be clarified, and the motives for difficulties with launching certain innovations, for instance European Monetary Union, will be explained. One of the arising questions whilst perusing this period of time is why negotiations did last so long, and therefore choke up implementation of any modernising treaties and dissolving agents.Crucial factor whilst considering the reasons for such slowing down is a historical context. Important here is the fact, that Europe, but also the whole world, was, we might say, in the middle of the Cold War. Started process of dtente, literary divided Europe, and two ideological camps in the struggle for the influence in the world politics, also lasting Vietnam War, all of that factors had a significant impact on the domestic politics of the European Community.During Hague summit has been agreed to introduce European M onetary System, however the EC was already divided into two camps of opinions and perceptions about the future reforms. On the one side stand economists, namely group created by Germany, Netherlands and to a certain extent Italy they opted for harmonisation of the scotch policies in Europe in the first line. On the other side were situated France, backed by Belgium and Luxembourg, namely monetarist camp proposing the monetary cooperation first, and then economic collaboration. In the result Werner Report has been created calling for simultaneous and dawdling implementation of both strategies in near future.11Subsequently, common bullion and key Bank as the controlling organ coordinating the financial and currency policy of the EC was decided to be introduced. However, future events of the decade undermined the whole process. One might ask why, for instance, Vietnam War had any impact on the domestic situation of the EC, but that together with other important event during that certain decade resulted in the economic instability, and in a consequence, major(ip) changes in world economic policies. More precisely, in 1971 Europe has been beauty by the international monetary crisis, which began in US, country involved in ideological and military Cold War struggle for hegemonic power, and greatly trimmed by military operations in Vietnam. Here can be seen how worldwide events directly affect the ECs domestic situation. Monetary crisis was furthermore enhanced by the huge American payment deficit, which also prominently destabilised European financial difficulties. The European Communitys member states struggled to find a suitable resolution of the monetary crisis however the opinions how to hardihood the problem were diverse. On the one hand, Germany proposed to join the ECs floating governance however, France opposed that solution and opted, on the other hand, for devaluation of dollar. In Council meeting no agreement has been achieved, and finally German y and Netherlands floated their currencies. In 1972 during Paris summit an agreement to a certain extent has been reached, and plan for the implementation of the European Monetary cooperation Fund was set up. Moreover, the EC states obliged themselves to reduce mutant and eventually launched the resolution called snake, in order to consolidate currency system among the ECs member states. Notwithstanding, snake failed later on as the result of the oil crisis, which occurred as the consequence of Yom Kippur war between Arab states and Israel in 1973. Oil crisis led to an occurrence called stagflation, and that abnormal the interior stability of the whole EC.The national negotiate between monetarists and economists demonstrates changes in the character of the process of European integration. The importance of onus in changing leading ideology of the integration was proclaimed in 2000 by Joschka Fischer, who said In the past, European integration was based on the Monnet method with its communitarization approach in European institutions and policy.12Founding fathers of the Community, Robert Schuman and Jean Monnet, advocated the communitarian hallucination of European unity, they believed in the possibility of creation of federation of European states, and supranational institutions as the leading and joining organs of the community. It is apparent in mid-sixties the existence in French foreign policy of the resistance to the supranationalism and federalism. It was oddly evident in de Gaulles vision of an intergovernmental Europe,13resulted in long opposition of an enlargement of the EC and protagonist policy protecting national interests. Changes of the leading figures of the member states lessened a little these national bargaining, and subsequently when Pompidou became the president of France, British membership was no longer resisted. Nevertheless, after final enlargement in 1973 there aroused another problem, namely Euroscepticism, mainly in UK and Denm ark, what became another issue in decision-making process. The outcome of the intergovernmental atmosphere and changed attitudes of the member states, enhanced to boot by the economic crisis, were predominantly evident in the work of the European Council. Some analysts even claim that the European Council in 1970s was emblematic of a profoundly intergovernmental era in the history of the EU.14All of the above factors extremely weakened and undermined the decision-making process.Further aspect that caused the difficulty in the stretch an agreement was the 1973s enlargements. It was not only, as has been said above, due to the less pro-European policy in new members than among other ECs states, but mainly because the effect it had on the European institutions. It was the first enlargements in the history of EU, and institutions such as, for example, the Commission, faced the problem of the growing number of diplomats and bureaucrats. Another problem of the European Community, beside the insufficiency of the European institutions weakened by the enlargement, was the lack of the leadership. As Jean Monnet claimed in 1974 What is deficient more than anything in European affairs is authority. Discussion is organised decision is not. By themselves the existing Community institutions are not strong enough.15Moreover, substantial impact on the process of European integration in 1970s to a great extent had a domestic situation of the member states, in particular of Germany, France, and UK. The Western Europe in 1970s had to face numerous problems of the various natures, economic, social as well as political. boost unemployment, high inflation, and decline of the domestic growth forced the members of the EC to infrangible their national interests rather than prioritise greater integration. As Urwin argued In the 1960s the average annual growth rate within the OECD countries had been 4.8 per cent in the 1970s it sank to 3.4 per cent.16Another issue was the spread of the terrorist threat, as the outcome of movements of 1968 in Germany, namely RAF organisation, and in France as well. However, also the importance of the feminist persuasion cannot be omitted, as it has a great impact on the economic situation, mainly because larger amount of women were seeking for work. As long as feminist has usually positive effect on the social progress of states, in that situation it exacerbated the scale of unemployment. Additionally, strikes in UK, and rising opposition in the political arena in Italy and Denmark, caused that member states governments focused more on the problems stroking their countries and autonomous solutions, rather than integration. Many of those problems aroused because of the financial crisis of 1970s, and affected the decision-making process in European institutions, what subsequently slowed down the negotiations, reaching of agreements, and finally integration per se.To summarise, the whole period since the 1969 Hague summit until, we may say 1979 pert mens report had been very unsuccessful period for the European integration. Three establish experts characterised in their report in 1979 bad condition of the Community and had doomed for that substantive problems stemming from economic and political constraints.17On the one hand, there have been some substantive improvements achieved during 1970s, such as first enlargement, EPC, or implementation of the European Council, nevertheless although the long struggles and negotiations the European Monetary System has not been launched, and member states acted more separately than collectively, securing their national interests. Derek Urwin argues that the EC failed to develop a concerted economic or political response to the crisis, indicating perhaps how considerably narrower national interests could uproot the common structure.18The main reasons for the slowing down in the integration appear to be monetary and economic crisis, exacerbated by war in the Middle Ea st domestic problems of the member states, which enhanced the intergovernmental character of the European cooperation and first enlargement, even if also seen as an achievement in a context of the widening, it had a great impact of the stability of the European institutions and decision-making process. We certainly can admit that to a significant extend process of European integration did slow down in 1970s, nevertheless that stagnation was a motivation for actions that have been undertaken in 1980s and further decades to domesticize a condition of the EC and improve the integration, which finally led to the signing of the Maastrich Treaty in 1992, establishing European Union.BibiographyBache I., S. George and S. Bulmer, Politics in the European Union, terzetto Edition, (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011), chapters 10-11Dinan D., Europe Recast, A History of European Union,(Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), chapters 4 5European NAvigator, The authoritative multimedia refe rence on the History of Europe, Historical Events 1969-1979 Crises and revival,http//www.ena.lu/?EUROPA, The EU at a glance The history of the European Union 1970-1979 A growing community,http//europa.eu/abc/history/1970-1979/index_en.htm modified 08 June 2010Milward A.S., The European Rescue of the Nation-State, Second Edition, (London Routledge, 2000), chapter 1Moravcsik A., The Choice for Europe, Social Purpose State power from Messina to Maastricht, (Oxon Routledge, 1999), chapters 4 7Nelsen B.R. and A.Stubb (eds.), The European Union, Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, terzetto Edition, (Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), chapters 6, 9 12Urwin D.W., A political History of Western Europe since 1945, Fifth Edition, (London Longman, 1997), chapters 15-20Urwin, D.W., The European Community From 1945 to 1985, in M. Cini and N. Prez-Solrzano Borragn (eds.), European Union Politics, Third Edition, (Oxford Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 15-31Urw in D.W., The Community of Europe A History of European Integration since 1945, Second Edition, (London Longman, 1995), chapters 10-15